Apr 15, 2025

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law
Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law
Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Introduction: Can an Invalid Contract Be Validated?

In principle, a contract that falls under a ground for nullity is exactly that - invalid. However, in many cases, an originally invalid contract can later be ratified by the party whom the nullity rule seeks to protect. This article explains when and how an invalid disposition can be remedied through subsequent approval, which limitations apply, and what legal effects such approval entails.

Limitations on the Right to Ratify

Although the main rule is that many invalid dispositions can be ratified, there are several important limitations:

  1. Counterparty Interests: A unilateral right to ratify may allow the promisor to speculate by ratifying favorable contracts while invoking invalidity for unfavorable ones.

  2. Public Interests: Some grounds for invalidity are justified by considerations beyond the parties' interests, which can limit the right to ratify.

  3. Validity of the Ratification Promise: The approval itself must meet the requirements of a valid disposition. For example, a person who is still a minor cannot "approve" their previously invalid promise.

Which Grounds for Nullity Can Be Remedied?

Capacity Deficiencies

Contracts that are invalid due to capacity deficiencies can, in principle, be remedied:

  • Mental Illness: A person who has recovered can approve contracts made during their mental illness.

  • Minority: A guardian can approve dispositions made by minors (cf. Guardianship Act § 14)

  • Person Who Has Reached Majority: A person who has reached the age of majority can approve dispositions they made as a minor.

Defects in Formation

Contracts that are invalid due to defects in formation can generally be ratified:

  • Coercion, Fraud, Forgery and Falsification: Can be approved when the circumstances that caused the invalidity no longer influence the promisor.

  • Misunderstanding: Can be approved when the misunderstanding is clarified.

The central premise is that the condition that caused the invalidity does not still adhere to the promise. A person who is still under duress cannot, of course, validly "approve" their disposition.

Content Defects

In the case of content defects, the picture is more complex:

  • Contracts Against Law and Decency (NL 5-1-2): Can normally not be ratified as they conflict with public interests.

  • Mandatory Rules to Protect Weak Contracting Parties: Here it is often crucial whether the approval occurs before or after the protected situation has arisen:

    • A prior waiver of consumer rights is normally invalid and cannot be ratified.

    • A subsequent waiver, when the consumer is aware of their rights and the relevant situation, may however be valid.

For rules like the Contract Act § 36 and the Pricing Regulations Act § 2, the same principle applies: One cannot in advance waive the protection these provisions grant, but can approve the contract after the unfairness has materialized and awareness of the circumstances is achieved.

Can the Counterparty Resist Ratification?

A key question is whether the counterparty can resist the ratification of an invalid contract. An unwritten legal principle applies here:

A counterparty in good faith can resist the promisor's unilateral ratification of an invalid contract.

This principle is based on an analogy from the Guardianship Act § 14 third paragraph, which for its area of application has a rule on the counterparty's right to oppose ratification where the guardian wishes to approve a contract that is invalid due to minority.

The rationale is that a counterparty who neither knew nor should have known about the invalidity when they received the promise should not be exposed to the promisor's speculative right. The counterparty typically had expectations that the contract was valid and may have arranged themselves accordingly.

Form and Content Requirements for Approval

For a disposition to be considered a valid approval, certain requirements must be met:

  • Clarity Requirement: The disposition must reasonably clearly reveal that it constitutes an approval.

  • Form Requirement: It is normally required that the approval be presented orally or in writing.

  • Skepticism towards Passivity: Approval in the form of passivity or by voluntary fulfillment should be approached with skepticism.

The approval disposition becomes binding for the giver when the counterparty becomes aware of it, similar to other promises.

Legal Effects of Approval

When an invalid contract is ratified, it is traditionally considered as if it had been valid all along. The effect is thus ex tunc (from that time) and not just ex nunc (from now onwards).

For the approval of minors' dispositions, this is explicitly stipulated in the Guardianship Act § 14 second paragraph second sentence: An approved disposition is effective from the time the disposition was made, not from the approval time.

In other cases, reservations must be made where a third party after the contract was entered into, but before the ratification, may have acquired a right or obligation affecting the contractual relationship. These complex questions must be resolved concretely based on the real considerations at stake in each specific case.

Conclusion: The Balance Between Contractual Freedom and Protective Considerations

The rules on the approval of invalid dispositions illustrate the tension between two fundamental considerations in contract law:

  1. Contractual Freedom which suggests that parties should be able to manage their rights.

  2. Protective Considerations which justify the rules of invalidity in the first instance.

The rules on ratification attempt to balance these considerations by allowing approval where the need for protection is no longer present, while the limitations ensure that both public interests and the interests of bona fide counterparties are safeguarded.

For professionals working with contract law issues, it is important to understand the nuances of these rules to assess when an originally invalid contract can or cannot be salvaged through subsequent approval.

Sterk Law Firm

Security through watertight agreements

Security through watertight agreements

Security through watertight agreements

Contracts form the framework for most binding relationships, whether in business or private life. A good contract creates predictability, allocates risk, and prevents conflicts. Inadequate contract regulation can, at worst, lead to prolonged disputes or significant financial losses. At Sterk Law Firm, you get a personal and pragmatic lawyer who understands your needs. We take the time to understand your business and industry so that we can tailor the terms to your purpose. At the same time, we pay attention to details and the "fine print" that can have major consequences. You can be assured that your rights and obligations are clearly and unambiguously set out. We have particular expertise in contracts related to construction, IT, commerce, real estate, and corporate matters. However, we also assist with more standalone agreements such as letters of intent, confidentiality agreements, leases, service agreements, and craftsmanship services. When necessary, we draw on the specialized expertise of our external partners. Most assignments begin with an assessment of the contract's purpose and the needs of the parties. We then review any drafts or offers from the counterparty and provide an evaluation of which terms should be included, amended, or removed. If desired, we can also draft the entire contract from scratch. Along the way, we maintain close communication with you as a client, ensuring you always have control over the process. We offer both ongoing advice and assistance with individual contracts. Our goal is to create long-term client relationships, and many choose us as their regular contract partner. We offer competitive prices and can provide advantageous framework agreements for businesses. Contact us today to find out what we can do for your business or contractual situation!

Contracts form the framework for most binding relationships, whether in business or private life. A good contract creates predictability, allocates risk, and prevents conflicts. Inadequate contract regulation can, at worst, lead to prolonged disputes or significant financial losses. At Sterk Law Firm, you get a personal and pragmatic lawyer who understands your needs. We take the time to understand your business and industry so that we can tailor the terms to your purpose. At the same time, we pay attention to details and the "fine print" that can have major consequences. You can be assured that your rights and obligations are clearly and unambiguously set out. We have particular expertise in contracts related to construction, IT, commerce, real estate, and corporate matters. However, we also assist with more standalone agreements such as letters of intent, confidentiality agreements, leases, service agreements, and craftsmanship services. When necessary, we draw on the specialized expertise of our external partners. Most assignments begin with an assessment of the contract's purpose and the needs of the parties. We then review any drafts or offers from the counterparty and provide an evaluation of which terms should be included, amended, or removed. If desired, we can also draft the entire contract from scratch. Along the way, we maintain close communication with you as a client, ensuring you always have control over the process. We offer both ongoing advice and assistance with individual contracts. Our goal is to create long-term client relationships, and many choose us as their regular contract partner. We offer competitive prices and can provide advantageous framework agreements for businesses. Contact us today to find out what we can do for your business or contractual situation!

Contracts form the framework for most binding relationships, whether in business or private life. A good contract creates predictability, allocates risk, and prevents conflicts. Inadequate contract regulation can, at worst, lead to prolonged disputes or significant financial losses. At Sterk Law Firm, you get a personal and pragmatic lawyer who understands your needs. We take the time to understand your business and industry so that we can tailor the terms to your purpose. At the same time, we pay attention to details and the "fine print" that can have major consequences. You can be assured that your rights and obligations are clearly and unambiguously set out. We have particular expertise in contracts related to construction, IT, commerce, real estate, and corporate matters. However, we also assist with more standalone agreements such as letters of intent, confidentiality agreements, leases, service agreements, and craftsmanship services. When necessary, we draw on the specialized expertise of our external partners. Most assignments begin with an assessment of the contract's purpose and the needs of the parties. We then review any drafts or offers from the counterparty and provide an evaluation of which terms should be included, amended, or removed. If desired, we can also draft the entire contract from scratch. Along the way, we maintain close communication with you as a client, ensuring you always have control over the process. We offer both ongoing advice and assistance with individual contracts. Our goal is to create long-term client relationships, and many choose us as their regular contract partner. We offer competitive prices and can provide advantageous framework agreements for businesses. Contact us today to find out what we can do for your business or contractual situation!

Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk

We draft contracts that protect your interests

We draft contracts that protect your interests

We draft contracts that protect your interests

Explore

More articles

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Interpretation rules are unwritten principles that provide guidance when the interpretative factors do not indicate a specific outcome in contract interpretation. The rule of ambiguity, the most central interpretative rule in Norwegian law, implies that the contract is interpreted against the party who should have expressed themselves more clearly. The minimum rule suggests that the least burdensome alternative for the promisor is chosen. For standard contracts, special considerations apply, but recent case law shows that these are also interpreted according to general interpretative principles. Particularly for 'agreed documents,' decisive weight is given to the wording, while unilateral standard terms are more often interpreted restrictively in favor of the weaker party.

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Interpretation rules are unwritten principles that provide guidance when the interpretative factors do not indicate a specific outcome in contract interpretation. The rule of ambiguity, the most central interpretative rule in Norwegian law, implies that the contract is interpreted against the party who should have expressed themselves more clearly. The minimum rule suggests that the least burdensome alternative for the promisor is chosen. For standard contracts, special considerations apply, but recent case law shows that these are also interpreted according to general interpretative principles. Particularly for 'agreed documents,' decisive weight is given to the wording, while unilateral standard terms are more often interpreted restrictively in favor of the weaker party.

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Interpretation rules are unwritten principles that provide guidance when the interpretative factors do not indicate a specific outcome in contract interpretation. The rule of ambiguity, the most central interpretative rule in Norwegian law, implies that the contract is interpreted against the party who should have expressed themselves more clearly. The minimum rule suggests that the least burdensome alternative for the promisor is chosen. For standard contracts, special considerations apply, but recent case law shows that these are also interpreted according to general interpretative principles. Particularly for 'agreed documents,' decisive weight is given to the wording, while unilateral standard terms are more often interpreted restrictively in favor of the weaker party.

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contract interpretation is a central aspect of contract law and concerns establishing the legal effects that an entered agreement has between the parties. In Norwegian law, the interpretation process primarily follows the objective interpretation principle but can be modified by the mutual understanding of the parties. In cases of unclear wording, the purpose of the agreement, the expectations of the parties, and genuine considerations are emphasized. Commercial agreements are interpreted particularly strictly according to their wording. In cases of persistent ambiguity, the agreement may be supplemented with solutions from background law. The good faith standard protects parties who had a legitimate expectation of how the agreement should be understood.

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contract interpretation is a central aspect of contract law and concerns establishing the legal effects that an entered agreement has between the parties. In Norwegian law, the interpretation process primarily follows the objective interpretation principle but can be modified by the mutual understanding of the parties. In cases of unclear wording, the purpose of the agreement, the expectations of the parties, and genuine considerations are emphasized. Commercial agreements are interpreted particularly strictly according to their wording. In cases of persistent ambiguity, the agreement may be supplemented with solutions from background law. The good faith standard protects parties who had a legitimate expectation of how the agreement should be understood.

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contract interpretation is a central aspect of contract law and concerns establishing the legal effects that an entered agreement has between the parties. In Norwegian law, the interpretation process primarily follows the objective interpretation principle but can be modified by the mutual understanding of the parties. In cases of unclear wording, the purpose of the agreement, the expectations of the parties, and genuine considerations are emphasized. Commercial agreements are interpreted particularly strictly according to their wording. In cases of persistent ambiguity, the agreement may be supplemented with solutions from background law. The good faith standard protects parties who had a legitimate expectation of how the agreement should be understood.

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Can an agreement that is initially invalid be subsequently ratified and thereby obtain legal effect? This article explains when an invalid disposition can be remedied through subsequent approval (ratification), what limitations apply to various grounds for invalidity, and how a bona fide co-contractor may oppose such ratification. A key aspect of contract law that balances the consideration of freedom of contract against the need to protect weaker parties.

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Can an agreement that is initially invalid be subsequently ratified and thereby obtain legal effect? This article explains when an invalid disposition can be remedied through subsequent approval (ratification), what limitations apply to various grounds for invalidity, and how a bona fide co-contractor may oppose such ratification. A key aspect of contract law that balances the consideration of freedom of contract against the need to protect weaker parties.

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Can an agreement that is initially invalid be subsequently ratified and thereby obtain legal effect? This article explains when an invalid disposition can be remedied through subsequent approval (ratification), what limitations apply to various grounds for invalidity, and how a bona fide co-contractor may oppose such ratification. A key aspect of contract law that balances the consideration of freedom of contract against the need to protect weaker parties.

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

When is an agreement invalid due to its content? This article provides an overview of central rules regarding content defects, ranging from agreements about games and betting to the general leniency rule in the Contracts Act § 36. The article explains when courts may set aside or amend agreements with unreasonable content, and how consumers have special protection through the Contracts Act § 37. Key decisions from the Supreme Court illustrate how the rules operate in practice.

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

When is an agreement invalid due to its content? This article provides an overview of central rules regarding content defects, ranging from agreements about games and betting to the general leniency rule in the Contracts Act § 36. The article explains when courts may set aside or amend agreements with unreasonable content, and how consumers have special protection through the Contracts Act § 37. Key decisions from the Supreme Court illustrate how the rules operate in practice.

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

When is an agreement invalid due to its content? This article provides an overview of central rules regarding content defects, ranging from agreements about games and betting to the general leniency rule in the Contracts Act § 36. The article explains when courts may set aside or amend agreements with unreasonable content, and how consumers have special protection through the Contracts Act § 37. Key decisions from the Supreme Court illustrate how the rules operate in practice.

Contact us

Contact Sterk Law Firm for legal assistance and advice. Our dedicated team of experienced lawyers is ready to find tailored solutions for your specific challenges.

Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence
Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence

By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.