Apr 23, 2025

Tax implications of establishing a private limited company and increasing share capital

Tax implications of establishing a limited company and increasing share capital
Tax implications of establishing a limited company and increasing share capital
Tax implications of establishing a limited company and increasing share capital

The establishment of a limited company or public limited company and the subsequent increase in share capital raise several tax issues, both for the company and the shareholders. This is particularly important when the shareholder contributes assets other than cash. In this article, we closely examine the tax consequences for both shareholders and the company in such transactions.

Main Forms of Capital Contribution

The default rule in company law is that capital contributions (share capital and share premium) are made in cash (Norwegian kroner). However, the law also permits contributions in the form of other assets, known as in-kind contributions. These can include real estate, business operations, intangible rights, or currency.

For an asset to be used as an in-kind contribution, it must be capable of being recorded on the company’s balance sheet. Therefore, an obligation to perform work or services for the company cannot be used as a share contribution. In capital increases, share contributions can also be settled by set-off, or through a bonus issue (transfer of other equity in the company to share capital).

Tax Consequences for the Shareholder

Contributions in the form of cash

The establishment of a company or capital increase where the shareholder contributes cash generally does not raise any specific tax issues for the shareholder at the time of contribution. The shareholder's acquisition cost and tax-paid capital correspond to the share contribution, i.e., share capital and any share premium.

It is possible that the subscription price (especially in capital increases) is higher or lower than the actual value of the shares issued. If the share subscription occurs in the same proportion as the shareholders' existing ownership, there is no tax liability or deduction right for any discount or premium.

Contributions in the form of assets (in-kind contributions)

When contributions are made in the form of assets, this is considered a realization of the assets in exchange for compensation in shares. The contributor must therefore calculate a gain or loss for each of the assets contributed, and the question of tax liability/deduction right is regulated by the general rules.

This also applies when the shareholder owns or becomes the owner of all shares in the company, as the shareholder and the company are considered separate tax entities. This principle was established in the Supreme Court ruling Rt. 1925 p. 624 (Oscar Larsen).

In calculating gain or loss, the exit value of the asset is set to the market value of the shares at the timing of the contribution. Normally, this also corresponds to the market value of the assets contributed. When several assets are contributed, the compensation must be allocated among the assets in the same proportion as the market value of each asset.

The gain or loss is timed according to the realization principle, based on when the contributor acquires an unconditional right to the shares. In practice, this is normally when the asset is considered delivered to the company, often at the time of the auditor's statement that the contribution has been received.

Set-off against a claim

A claim against the company in which shares are subscribed cannot be used as an in-kind contribution but can be used for set-off of a contribution obligation. Set-off is considered a realization of the claim, and a gain and loss settlement must be conducted for the creditor (the subscriber) if the realization of the claim is taxable.

In calculating gain and loss, the exit value is normally the value of the shares issued. In practice, it is assumed that the exit value of the claim should be set to the real value of the shares, especially in refinancing of companies in economic trouble where the real value of the claim is often lower than its nominal value.

Tax Acquisition Cost and Paid Capital

The shareholder’s tax acquisition cost for shares is primarily what the taxpayer has paid for the shares, plus any acquisition costs. In the case of in-kind contributions, the acquisition cost of the shares and tax-paid capital is generally set to the market value of the transferred assets at the time of transfer.

In a bonus issue, the shareholder’s acquisition cost is spread over a larger number of shares without any payment. The acquisition cost of a bonus share is set to a proportional part of the acquisition cost of the shares to which the bonus share is related. However, the tax position of paid capital is not distributed in the same way, since, in principle, no capital is paid on the bonus shares.

Choice Between Issuing New Shares or Increasing Par Value

In a capital increase, one can choose between issuing new shares or increasing the par value of existing shares. This choice can have tax consequences.

When issuing new shares, the acquisition cost is allocated to the new shares. When increasing the par value, the acquisition cost is added to the shareholder's previous acquisition cost of the existing shares. This also applies to the tax position of paid capital.

Since shielding is determined separately for each share, a capital increase by issuing new shares may result in the shareholder having different basis amounts for their original and newly issued shares. This may also lead to different taxation of dividends and gains on the shareholder’s shares. In most cases, it is therefore advantageous to perform a capital increase by increasing the par value rather than issuing new shares.

Deduction Right for Costs

The shareholder does not have a direct right to deduct the establishment costs in cases where the shareholder incurs these costs, but must capitalize them on the shares. For shareholders covered by the shareholder model, the costs are deducted through gain calculation upon realization of the shares. The costs also enter into the basis for shielding for the shareholders.

Tax Consequences for the Company

Contributions are Not Taxable Income

Contributions to a limited company (share capital and share premium) in connection with establishment or capital increase are not considered taxable income for the company. This applies regardless of whether the subscription price deviates from underlying values. The principle was established by the Supreme Court as early as Rt. 1917 p. 627 (Tromsø Privatbank).

When Does Tax Liability for the Company Arise?

A limited company is considered established when all founders have signed the founding document. In practice, tax law has been interpreted such that the subjective tax liability arises at this time, even though the company may later acquire rights and incur obligations towards third parties.

Allocation of Result Between Contributor and Company

Upon the transfer of assets or business as an in-kind contribution, each party must be taxed for the income that according to timing rules falls within their ownership period. This principle was established in Rt. 1966 p. 1470 (Tomren). In practice, January 1st of the transfer year is often used as the effective date for practical reasons.

Tax Acquisition Cost of the Assets

The Supreme Court in Rt. 1995 p. 1674 (Viking Supply) established that the company's acquisition cost of contributed assets should correspond to the market value of the objects being contributed, and not the value of the shares issued. This may lead to a lack of tax continuity between the contributor's exit value and the company's acquisition cost.

Deduction Right for Costs

It is generally accepted in practice and theory that expenses for establishment and capital increase are deductible if the company itself covers the expenses. The company can choose between expensing the costs immediately or deducting them gradually as income permits.

If the expenses are part of a larger transaction/acquisition, it is necessary to distinguish between costs related to the establishment or capital increase, and those related to the transaction/acquisition. Transaction costs for the acquisition of shares must be capitalized as part of the company’s acquisition cost of the shares.

Special Cases and Exceptions

Tax-Free Transformation and Merger/Demerger

Upon transformation of a sole proprietorship or partnership into a limited company, or during merger and demerger, it can be carried out with tax continuity under certain conditions. This also applies to tax positions such as deficits, positive gain and loss account, and negative balance.

Deduction Right for Share Contributions in Start-Up Companies

Individual taxpayers are entitled to a deduction of up to NOK 500,000 for share contributions at the establishment or capital increase in start-up companies under certain conditions. The criteria for obtaining such a deduction are quite detailed and impose several restrictions on which companies are eligible for the scheme.

Summary

The establishment of a limited company and increase in share capital raises several tax issues that must be carefully considered. This is particularly relevant when the share contribution is made with assets other than cash. A thorough understanding of the tax consequences is important for both the company and the shareholders and may influence the choice between different methods of capital contribution.

Sterk Law Firm

Your Partner in Norwegian Corporate Law

Your Partner in Norwegian Corporate Law

Your Partner in Norwegian Corporate Law

The legal structure forms the framework for your business. The choice of structure, governance documents, and agreements will have significant impacts throughout the company's lifespan. Errors and deficiencies can lead to substantial consequences, both legally and financially. Therefore, it is crucial to have a competent business attorney by your side. At Sterk Law Firm, we have extensive experience advising companies and their owners. We are aware of the common pitfalls and know how to build a robust structure for the future. Whether you are establishing a new company, bringing in investors, executing a merger, or winding down operations, we can assist with tailored solutions. We see it as our duty to clarify what you can achieve and how various solutions will impact the company. Our advice is practical and business-oriented, with an eye for both legal and commercial aspects of the matter. We will be a sparring partner who challenges you when necessary, to ensure all possibilities are considered before a decision is made. As a permanent attorney, we can also assume the role of company secretary and become an integral part of the company's management. We assist with calling, minute-taking, and conducting general meetings and board meetings, as well as updating the share register and notifications to the Register of Business Enterprises. Most of our clients choose an ongoing advisory agreement so that we are available when the need arises. Others seek assistance for standalone transactions or projects. We tailor our offer to your needs and provide you with a predictable price based on a fixed hourly rate or unit price. Contact us today for a non-binding conversation!

The legal structure forms the framework for your business. The choice of structure, governance documents, and agreements will have significant impacts throughout the company's lifespan. Errors and deficiencies can lead to substantial consequences, both legally and financially. Therefore, it is crucial to have a competent business attorney by your side. At Sterk Law Firm, we have extensive experience advising companies and their owners. We are aware of the common pitfalls and know how to build a robust structure for the future. Whether you are establishing a new company, bringing in investors, executing a merger, or winding down operations, we can assist with tailored solutions. We see it as our duty to clarify what you can achieve and how various solutions will impact the company. Our advice is practical and business-oriented, with an eye for both legal and commercial aspects of the matter. We will be a sparring partner who challenges you when necessary, to ensure all possibilities are considered before a decision is made. As a permanent attorney, we can also assume the role of company secretary and become an integral part of the company's management. We assist with calling, minute-taking, and conducting general meetings and board meetings, as well as updating the share register and notifications to the Register of Business Enterprises. Most of our clients choose an ongoing advisory agreement so that we are available when the need arises. Others seek assistance for standalone transactions or projects. We tailor our offer to your needs and provide you with a predictable price based on a fixed hourly rate or unit price. Contact us today for a non-binding conversation!

The legal structure forms the framework for your business. The choice of structure, governance documents, and agreements will have significant impacts throughout the company's lifespan. Errors and deficiencies can lead to substantial consequences, both legally and financially. Therefore, it is crucial to have a competent business attorney by your side. At Sterk Law Firm, we have extensive experience advising companies and their owners. We are aware of the common pitfalls and know how to build a robust structure for the future. Whether you are establishing a new company, bringing in investors, executing a merger, or winding down operations, we can assist with tailored solutions. We see it as our duty to clarify what you can achieve and how various solutions will impact the company. Our advice is practical and business-oriented, with an eye for both legal and commercial aspects of the matter. We will be a sparring partner who challenges you when necessary, to ensure all possibilities are considered before a decision is made. As a permanent attorney, we can also assume the role of company secretary and become an integral part of the company's management. We assist with calling, minute-taking, and conducting general meetings and board meetings, as well as updating the share register and notifications to the Register of Business Enterprises. Most of our clients choose an ongoing advisory agreement so that we are available when the need arises. Others seek assistance for standalone transactions or projects. We tailor our offer to your needs and provide you with a predictable price based on a fixed hourly rate or unit price. Contact us today for a non-binding conversation!

Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk

We build strong corporate structures and safeguard your ownership interests

We build strong corporate structures and safeguard your ownership interests

We build strong corporate structures and safeguard your ownership interests

Explore

More articles

Tax implications of establishing a limited company and increasing share capital

Corporate Law

Apr 23, 2025

Tax implications of establishing a private limited company and increasing share capital

The establishment of a limited liability company and the increase of share capital have significant tax implications, particularly in the case of contributions in kind. For the shareholder, the contribution of assets is considered as a realization in exchange for shares, followed by a calculation of gains or losses. The value of the contribution usually becomes the shareholder's initial acquisition cost and is regarded as tax-deductible capital. For the company, contributions are not considered taxable income, and the company receives initial acquisition values corresponding to the market value of the contributed assets. The choice between issuing new shares or increasing the nominal value impacts the allowance base and the subsequent taxation of dividends and gains.

Tax implications of establishing a limited company and increasing share capital

Corporate Law

Apr 23, 2025

Tax implications of establishing a private limited company and increasing share capital

The establishment of a limited liability company and the increase of share capital have significant tax implications, particularly in the case of contributions in kind. For the shareholder, the contribution of assets is considered as a realization in exchange for shares, followed by a calculation of gains or losses. The value of the contribution usually becomes the shareholder's initial acquisition cost and is regarded as tax-deductible capital. For the company, contributions are not considered taxable income, and the company receives initial acquisition values corresponding to the market value of the contributed assets. The choice between issuing new shares or increasing the nominal value impacts the allowance base and the subsequent taxation of dividends and gains.

Tax implications of establishing a limited company and increasing share capital

Corporate Law

Apr 23, 2025

Tax implications of establishing a private limited company and increasing share capital

The establishment of a limited liability company and the increase of share capital have significant tax implications, particularly in the case of contributions in kind. For the shareholder, the contribution of assets is considered as a realization in exchange for shares, followed by a calculation of gains or losses. The value of the contribution usually becomes the shareholder's initial acquisition cost and is regarded as tax-deductible capital. For the company, contributions are not considered taxable income, and the company receives initial acquisition values corresponding to the market value of the contributed assets. The choice between issuing new shares or increasing the nominal value impacts the allowance base and the subsequent taxation of dividends and gains.

The Exemption Method in Norwegian Tax Law: Tax Exemption for Companies as Shareholders

Corporate Law

Apr 23, 2025

The Exemption Method: Tax Exemption for Companies in Norwegian Tax Law

The exemption method is a key scheme in Norwegian tax law that exempts companies from tax liability on dividends and share gains, intended to prevent chain taxation. The scheme encompasses both Norwegian and foreign companies, but with significant exceptions for income from companies in low-tax countries and portfolio investments outside the EEA. Even with the exemption method, companies must recognize three percent of received dividends as income, except for dividends within tax groups. The rules often require consideration of ownership interests, voting rights, and genuine establishment. RetryKA

The Exemption Method in Norwegian Tax Law: Tax Exemption for Companies as Shareholders

Corporate Law

Apr 23, 2025

The Exemption Method: Tax Exemption for Companies in Norwegian Tax Law

The exemption method is a key scheme in Norwegian tax law that exempts companies from tax liability on dividends and share gains, intended to prevent chain taxation. The scheme encompasses both Norwegian and foreign companies, but with significant exceptions for income from companies in low-tax countries and portfolio investments outside the EEA. Even with the exemption method, companies must recognize three percent of received dividends as income, except for dividends within tax groups. The rules often require consideration of ownership interests, voting rights, and genuine establishment. RetryKA

The Exemption Method in Norwegian Tax Law: Tax Exemption for Companies as Shareholders

Corporate Law

Apr 23, 2025

The Exemption Method: Tax Exemption for Companies in Norwegian Tax Law

The exemption method is a key scheme in Norwegian tax law that exempts companies from tax liability on dividends and share gains, intended to prevent chain taxation. The scheme encompasses both Norwegian and foreign companies, but with significant exceptions for income from companies in low-tax countries and portfolio investments outside the EEA. Even with the exemption method, companies must recognize three percent of received dividends as income, except for dividends within tax groups. The rules often require consideration of ownership interests, voting rights, and genuine establishment. RetryKA

Representation of Companies Outward: Authority, Credentials, and Binding Agreements

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Company Law: Competence, Authority, and Representation

The authority of company representatives to bind the company through agreements is governed by a dual set of rules. Internally, competence is limited by company law, the articles of association, and instructions, while externally, the authority is often broader. In limited liability companies, the board represents the company externally with unlimited signatory powers, while the managing director can bind the company in matters within the scope of daily management. Exceeding competence will generally not exempt the company from being bound if the counterparty acted in reasonable good faith. This protection of the counterparty is particularly strong for limited liability companies through the EU's Disclosure Directive. For general partnerships, the participants represent the company individually unless otherwise agreed, with similar authority rules as for limited liability companies. Good corporate governance presupposes clear division of competencies and open communication regarding the scope of representational rights.

Representation of Companies Outward: Authority, Credentials, and Binding Agreements

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Company Law: Competence, Authority, and Representation

The authority of company representatives to bind the company through agreements is governed by a dual set of rules. Internally, competence is limited by company law, the articles of association, and instructions, while externally, the authority is often broader. In limited liability companies, the board represents the company externally with unlimited signatory powers, while the managing director can bind the company in matters within the scope of daily management. Exceeding competence will generally not exempt the company from being bound if the counterparty acted in reasonable good faith. This protection of the counterparty is particularly strong for limited liability companies through the EU's Disclosure Directive. For general partnerships, the participants represent the company individually unless otherwise agreed, with similar authority rules as for limited liability companies. Good corporate governance presupposes clear division of competencies and open communication regarding the scope of representational rights.

Representation of Companies Outward: Authority, Credentials, and Binding Agreements

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Company Law: Competence, Authority, and Representation

The authority of company representatives to bind the company through agreements is governed by a dual set of rules. Internally, competence is limited by company law, the articles of association, and instructions, while externally, the authority is often broader. In limited liability companies, the board represents the company externally with unlimited signatory powers, while the managing director can bind the company in matters within the scope of daily management. Exceeding competence will generally not exempt the company from being bound if the counterparty acted in reasonable good faith. This protection of the counterparty is particularly strong for limited liability companies through the EU's Disclosure Directive. For general partnerships, the participants represent the company individually unless otherwise agreed, with similar authority rules as for limited liability companies. Good corporate governance presupposes clear division of competencies and open communication regarding the scope of representational rights.

Organization of a partnership: The role and authority of corporate bodies

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Organization of Partnerships – Function and Competence of Corporate Bodies

Responsible companies are characterized by a flexible organizational structure where the company meeting is the only mandatory body. The company meeting constitutes the highest authority of the company, and the basic principle is that all decisions require unanimity among the participants—a principle that directly corresponds with their unlimited and joint liability for company obligations. In companies without a board or managing director, each participant can perform actions that are a natural part of the ongoing operations. The company may also choose to have a board and managing director, who will then be responsible for the general management. The employees' right to representation is primarily safeguarded in the company meeting. The provisions of the Companies Act are largely flexible, allowing the organization of the company to be tailored according to the needs of the business and the desires of the participants.

Organization of a partnership: The role and authority of corporate bodies

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Organization of Partnerships – Function and Competence of Corporate Bodies

Responsible companies are characterized by a flexible organizational structure where the company meeting is the only mandatory body. The company meeting constitutes the highest authority of the company, and the basic principle is that all decisions require unanimity among the participants—a principle that directly corresponds with their unlimited and joint liability for company obligations. In companies without a board or managing director, each participant can perform actions that are a natural part of the ongoing operations. The company may also choose to have a board and managing director, who will then be responsible for the general management. The employees' right to representation is primarily safeguarded in the company meeting. The provisions of the Companies Act are largely flexible, allowing the organization of the company to be tailored according to the needs of the business and the desires of the participants.

Organization of a partnership: The role and authority of corporate bodies

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Organization of Partnerships – Function and Competence of Corporate Bodies

Responsible companies are characterized by a flexible organizational structure where the company meeting is the only mandatory body. The company meeting constitutes the highest authority of the company, and the basic principle is that all decisions require unanimity among the participants—a principle that directly corresponds with their unlimited and joint liability for company obligations. In companies without a board or managing director, each participant can perform actions that are a natural part of the ongoing operations. The company may also choose to have a board and managing director, who will then be responsible for the general management. The employees' right to representation is primarily safeguarded in the company meeting. The provisions of the Companies Act are largely flexible, allowing the organization of the company to be tailored according to the needs of the business and the desires of the participants.

Contact us

Contact Sterk Law Firm for legal assistance and advice. Our dedicated team of experienced lawyers is ready to find tailored solutions for your specific challenges.

Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence
Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence

By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.