Apr 8, 2025

Non-Compete Clauses in Employment Relationships – Conditions, Compensation, and Limitations

Non-compete Clauses in Employment Relationships: Regulations and Conditions According to the Working Environment Act
Non-compete Clauses in Employment Relationships: Regulations and Conditions According to the Working Environment Act
Non-compete Clauses in Employment Relationships: Regulations and Conditions According to the Working Environment Act

Non-Compete Clauses in Employment Relationships: Regulations and Conditions under the Working Environment Act

Introduction

Non-compete clauses are agreements between the employer and the employee that restrict the employee's ability to work for competitors or start their own business after the employment relationship has ended. The Working Environment Act Chapter 14 A contains detailed rules regarding such agreements, with strict requirements for content, validity, and compensation. This article provides a thorough review of the regulations for non-compete clauses, from definition and formal requirements to obligations for explanation and calculation of compensation.

What is a Non-Compete Clause?

The Working Environment Act § 14 A-1 (1) defines a non-compete clause as an "agreement between employer and employee that restricts the employee's access to take a position with another employer or start, run, or participate in another business after the termination of employment".

For an agreement to be considered as a non-compete clause, four criteria must be met:

  1. The agreement must be entered into between the employer and the employee

  2. The agreement must restrict the employee's freedom of action (either through prohibition or by making certain actions less attractive)

  3. The restriction must concern access to take a position with another employer or the ability to start, run, or participate in another business

  4. The agreement must regulate the relationship after the termination of employment

Restrictions on freedom of action include both direct prohibitions and agreements that make it less attractive for the employee to act in certain ways, for example by requiring compensation to the previous employer.

Formal Requirements for Non-Compete Clauses

For a non-compete clause to be valid, the Working Environment Act prescribes two formal requirements:

Requirement for Written Form

The non-compete clause must be made in writing, cf. Working Environment Act § 14 A-1 (3). This is a condition of validity, and the purpose is to ensure notoriety and predictability regarding the agreement.

Time Limitation

A non-compete clause can be enforced for a maximum of one year from the termination of employment, cf. Working Environment Act § 14 A-1 (2) second sentence. This period is commonly referred to as the quarantine period.

Basic Condition – Special Need for Protection Against Competition

Even if a non-compete clause is formally valid, it can only be enforced "as far as necessary to safeguard the employer's special need for protection against competition", cf. Working Environment Act § 14 A-1 (2).

This basic condition involves a two-part assessment:

  1. Conditions of the employer's operation: There must be trade secrets or know-how that are worthy of protection.

  2. Employee's insight: The employee must have actual knowledge of these conditions.

Worthy of Protection Conditions

It is primarily trade secrets and know-how that can form the basis for a non-compete clause. What qualifies as trade secrets and know-how must be determined based on law and case practice.

The Business Secrets Act § 2 defines a business secret as information that:

  • Is secret (not commonly known or easily accessible)

  • Has commercial value due to being secret

  • The owner has taken reasonable measures to ensure it remains secret

Know-how is at the border between trade secrets and general knowledge. In Rt. 1964 s. 238 (Notflottør), the Supreme Court defined know-how as "the collection of technical details, knowledge, and experiences that collectively can be crucial for a company's competitiveness, but which individually may seem insignificant".

General knowledge that the employee has acquired through education and experience does not provide grounds for protection.

Employee's Actual Insight

It is the employee's actual knowledge of trade secrets and know-how that is decisive, not the title of the position or the level in the organization. Relevant assessment factors can include:

  • Employee's position

  • Length of employment

  • Access to sensitive information

  • Participation in development work

For employees with short-term employment relationships (six months or less), there will only exceptionally be grounds to enforce a non-compete clause.

Assessment of Necessity

The non-compete clause can only be enforced to the extent necessary to safeguard the employer's needs. This means that:

  • The clause can only cover businesses that the employer actually competes with or that may become competitors in the near future

  • The clause cannot extend over a longer time than the protection against competition dictates

A non-compete clause that is enforced to a greater extent than necessary may be wholly or partly voided (censored).

Employer's Duty to Explain

To ensure predictability for the employee and prevent the use of unnecessary clauses, the Working Environment Act § 14 A-2 imposes a duty to explain on the employer.

Timing of Explanation

  • The employee can request a written explanation at any time as to whether the non-compete clause will be enforced

  • The employer must provide the explanation within four weeks of a written request

  • Upon termination of employment, special deadlines apply if an explanation has not already been given

Content of the Explanation

The explanation must include:

  1. Whether and to what extent the non-compete clause will be enforced, including:

    • The duration of the clause

    • Geographical area of effect

    • Which business areas or types of business are covered

  2. Which conditions justify that the employer has a special need for protection against competition

Binding Effect

The explanation is binding for the employer for three months from when the employee received the written explanation. If the employment relationship ends, the explanation is binding throughout the notice period.

The consequence of missing or late explanation is that the non-compete clause ceases to apply, cf. Working Environment Act § 14 A-1 (6).

Compensation for Non-Compete Clauses

The Working Environment Act § 14 A-3 requires the employer to pay the employee compensation during the quarantine period. This is meant to:

  • Compensate the employee for restrictions on freedom of action

  • Give the employer a financial incentive to carefully consider the need for the clause

  • Prevent the costs of the non-compete clause from being shifted to the public sector in the form of unemployment benefits

Calculation of Compensation Basis

The basis for compensation is calculated based on "employment remuneration" that the employee has earned in the last twelve months before the notice or dismissal point.

The following are included in the compensation basis:

  • Regular salary

  • Overtime allowances

  • Commissions

  • Bonuses

  • Holiday pay

The following may be excluded:

  • Benefits in kind (free newspaper, phone, car)

  • Expense coverage (car maintenance, travel, food, accommodation)

  • Insurance premiums and pension contributions paid to third parties

Amount of Compensation

The compensation shall amount to:

  • 100 percent of the compensation basis up to 8G (National Insurance base amount)

  • 70 percent of the compensation basis exceeding 8G

Total compensation may be limited to 12G, but parties can agree on higher compensation.

Deduction for Other Income

The employer may deduct work remuneration or work income that the employee receives or earns during the quarantine period, but only up to half of the compensation. This gives the employee an incentive to seek income-generating work during the period.

To apply deductions, the employer can require the employee to disclose any income during the quarantine period.

Consequences of Breach of Non-Compete Clause

A non-compete clause is a mutually burdensome agreement. If the employee breaches the non-compete clause, the employer can, according to general contract law principles, withhold compensation.

If the employer unjustly withholds compensation, the employee can at some point declare themselves not bound by the agreement due to the employer's breach. Alternatively, the employee can maintain the claim for compensation, but this assumes that they themselves comply with the non-compete clause.

Summary

The regulations for non-compete clauses balance the employer's need for protection against competition with the employee's need to utilize their skills and work abilities. The key conditions for valid non-compete clauses are:

  1. Written form

  2. Time limitation (maximum one year)

  3. Employer's special need for protection against competition

  4. Employer's explanation

  5. Compensation to the employee

These rules ensure that non-compete clauses are only used where there is a real need and that the employee is financially compensated for the restrictions imposed.

Sterk Law Firm

Your Partner for a Well-Functioning Workplace

Your Partner for a Well-Functioning Workplace

Your Partner for a Well-Functioning Workplace

Employment law challenges can be complex and time-consuming, whether you are a business leader or an employee. The consequences of incorrect handling can be significant, both in human and economic terms. Our lawyers have extensive experience from various aspects of working life and broad expertise in all areas of employment law. We can therefore offer precise advice and support throughout the process, allowing you to focus on your core business.

Employment law challenges can be complex and time-consuming, whether you are a business leader or an employee. The consequences of incorrect handling can be significant, both in human and economic terms. Our lawyers have extensive experience from various aspects of working life and broad expertise in all areas of employment law. We can therefore offer precise advice and support throughout the process, allowing you to focus on your core business.

Employment law challenges can be complex and time-consuming, whether you are a business leader or an employee. The consequences of incorrect handling can be significant, both in human and economic terms. Our lawyers have extensive experience from various aspects of working life and broad expertise in all areas of employment law. We can therefore offer precise advice and support throughout the process, allowing you to focus on your core business.

Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk

Comprehensive Employment Law Assistance

Comprehensive Employment Law Assistance

Comprehensive Employment Law Assistance

Explore

More articles

Invalidity and Compensation for Wrongful Termination of Employment in Norwegian Law

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Invalidity and compensation for unjust dismissal or termination. In blog posts, emphasize that it pertains to Norwegian law.

In cases of wrongful termination or unjust dismissal, the court shall generally rule that the termination is invalid, allowing the employee to continue in or be reinstated to their position. Even if the position has been filled by another, the employee is entitled to at least an equivalent position. In exceptional cases, the court may nonetheless decide that the employment relationship should end. Additionally, the employee may claim compensation for financial losses and reparation, where the assessment is based on a broad consideration of fairness with emphasis on the parties' conditions and other relevant circumstances.

Invalidity and Compensation for Wrongful Termination of Employment in Norwegian Law

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Invalidity and compensation for unjust dismissal or termination. In blog posts, emphasize that it pertains to Norwegian law.

In cases of wrongful termination or unjust dismissal, the court shall generally rule that the termination is invalid, allowing the employee to continue in or be reinstated to their position. Even if the position has been filled by another, the employee is entitled to at least an equivalent position. In exceptional cases, the court may nonetheless decide that the employment relationship should end. Additionally, the employee may claim compensation for financial losses and reparation, where the assessment is based on a broad consideration of fairness with emphasis on the parties' conditions and other relevant circumstances.

Invalidity and Compensation for Wrongful Termination of Employment in Norwegian Law

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Invalidity and compensation for unjust dismissal or termination. In blog posts, emphasize that it pertains to Norwegian law.

In cases of wrongful termination or unjust dismissal, the court shall generally rule that the termination is invalid, allowing the employee to continue in or be reinstated to their position. Even if the position has been filled by another, the employee is entitled to at least an equivalent position. In exceptional cases, the court may nonetheless decide that the employment relationship should end. Additionally, the employee may claim compensation for financial losses and reparation, where the assessment is based on a broad consideration of fairness with emphasis on the parties' conditions and other relevant circumstances.

Procedural rules for disputes concerning the termination of employment: Negotiations, deadlines, and the right to remain in position

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employment Law: Disputes about Termination and Dismissal

In the event of a dispute concerning termination or dismissal, specific procedural rules apply. The employee has the right to request negotiations within two weeks, and the employer is obliged to conduct a negotiation meeting within two weeks of receiving the request. In the case of termination, the employee is entitled to remain in their position while the dispute is ongoing, but the employer can demand resignation if continuation is unreasonable. The deadline for filing a lawsuit to contest the legality of the termination is eight weeks, and six months for pure compensation claims. Formal errors in the termination result in the annulment of the lawsuit deadline.

Procedural rules for disputes concerning the termination of employment: Negotiations, deadlines, and the right to remain in position

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employment Law: Disputes about Termination and Dismissal

In the event of a dispute concerning termination or dismissal, specific procedural rules apply. The employee has the right to request negotiations within two weeks, and the employer is obliged to conduct a negotiation meeting within two weeks of receiving the request. In the case of termination, the employee is entitled to remain in their position while the dispute is ongoing, but the employer can demand resignation if continuation is unreasonable. The deadline for filing a lawsuit to contest the legality of the termination is eight weeks, and six months for pure compensation claims. Formal errors in the termination result in the annulment of the lawsuit deadline.

Procedural rules for disputes concerning the termination of employment: Negotiations, deadlines, and the right to remain in position

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employment Law: Disputes about Termination and Dismissal

In the event of a dispute concerning termination or dismissal, specific procedural rules apply. The employee has the right to request negotiations within two weeks, and the employer is obliged to conduct a negotiation meeting within two weeks of receiving the request. In the case of termination, the employee is entitled to remain in their position while the dispute is ongoing, but the employer can demand resignation if continuation is unreasonable. The deadline for filing a lawsuit to contest the legality of the termination is eight weeks, and six months for pure compensation claims. Formal errors in the termination result in the annulment of the lawsuit deadline.

The Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract: Terms and Consequences

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract – Conditions, Legal Effects, and Burden of Proof

The employee's right to termination involves the ability to immediately end the employment relationship due to the employer's substantial breach. This right is not codified in the Working Environment Act but derives from general contractual principles. Typical reasons for termination include non-payment of wages, harassment, or serious violations of safety regulations. The Supreme Court in the Stryn Pharmacy case has established that the threshold is high, particularly concerning psychosocial work environment issues. In the event of rightful termination, the employee may claim compensation for financial loss.

The Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract: Terms and Consequences

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract – Conditions, Legal Effects, and Burden of Proof

The employee's right to termination involves the ability to immediately end the employment relationship due to the employer's substantial breach. This right is not codified in the Working Environment Act but derives from general contractual principles. Typical reasons for termination include non-payment of wages, harassment, or serious violations of safety regulations. The Supreme Court in the Stryn Pharmacy case has established that the threshold is high, particularly concerning psychosocial work environment issues. In the event of rightful termination, the employee may claim compensation for financial loss.

The Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract: Terms and Consequences

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract – Conditions, Legal Effects, and Burden of Proof

The employee's right to termination involves the ability to immediately end the employment relationship due to the employer's substantial breach. This right is not codified in the Working Environment Act but derives from general contractual principles. Typical reasons for termination include non-payment of wages, harassment, or serious violations of safety regulations. The Supreme Court in the Stryn Pharmacy case has established that the threshold is high, particularly concerning psychosocial work environment issues. In the event of rightful termination, the employee may claim compensation for financial loss.

Dismissal in Employment Relationships: Legal Conditions and Overall Assessment

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Dismissal in Employment Relationships – Conditions, Process, and Case Law

Dismissal represents the employer's right to terminate the employment contract immediately in the event of gross misconduct or significant breach by the employee. The threshold is very high, and a thorough overall assessment is required, with emphasis placed on the seriousness of the act, the employee's fault, and the circumstances of the business. The dismissal must not appear as a disproportionate reaction, and case law shows that the employer's own handling of the situation often carries great weight. The procedural rules mainly correspond to the rules for termination.

Dismissal in Employment Relationships: Legal Conditions and Overall Assessment

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Dismissal in Employment Relationships – Conditions, Process, and Case Law

Dismissal represents the employer's right to terminate the employment contract immediately in the event of gross misconduct or significant breach by the employee. The threshold is very high, and a thorough overall assessment is required, with emphasis placed on the seriousness of the act, the employee's fault, and the circumstances of the business. The dismissal must not appear as a disproportionate reaction, and case law shows that the employer's own handling of the situation often carries great weight. The procedural rules mainly correspond to the rules for termination.

Dismissal in Employment Relationships: Legal Conditions and Overall Assessment

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Dismissal in Employment Relationships – Conditions, Process, and Case Law

Dismissal represents the employer's right to terminate the employment contract immediately in the event of gross misconduct or significant breach by the employee. The threshold is very high, and a thorough overall assessment is required, with emphasis placed on the seriousness of the act, the employee's fault, and the circumstances of the business. The dismissal must not appear as a disproportionate reaction, and case law shows that the employer's own handling of the situation often carries great weight. The procedural rules mainly correspond to the rules for termination.

Contact us

Contact Sterk Law Firm for legal assistance and advice. Our dedicated team of experienced lawyers is ready to find tailored solutions for your specific challenges.

Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence
Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence

By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.